A person on this forum just asked me a good question. They wrote me (as I summarize and clarify)
In short, this is not my religion, nor is Hebrew my lingusitic proficiency. i am Hindu, and understand Sanskrit, which you say is connected to the roots of some of the words used, and has influence on the emergence of early pre-Torahatic Judiasm from Canaan cultures. What Sanskrit prayer would you advise.
In my creation of this thread, it was my intent to demonstrate A prayer, certainly not the ONLY prayer. I am not Hindu. My Sanskrit is barely rudimentary. I admit this often... despite some of the stuff I know is not rudimentary, and generally not part of the conversational form of the modern language. Some is considered advanced critical knowledge of the language - but still, I am but a novice in my over-all use of the language or history of its a morphology.
The El Adon is not a quote from the Torah, or Bible, or anything. No one knows who composed it - but it has been used for a long time, until it was essentially "thrown out" for no cause nor no reason other than its growing importance.
A mantrum is a repetitious liturgical reading. Most are passages citing the vedas. In the Vedic times, the term "sukta" would apply to an inspired composition. I am not the best authority on Hinduism or even Vedism, but for what it is worth, I would say by historical demonstration and content of the words, The Narayana Sukta would be MY choice for a sanskrit composition that would amp up the NAP, as I understand and apply it.
I have not used this in relation to NAP directly, but to things derived from some of the same sources and in other works - and it is very potent as well. It is not historical, but I have every reason to believe it will amp up NAP as well. I am just not sure if it would in the same way. Some of the wiring is slightly different in its mechanics, for example - it does not follow a natural progression through the ordinal lettering of the devagenari script (as in the case of El Adon which has lines that start with an "aleph" then a "beth" then a "gimel" etc.) The theme is there, but not the natural momentum of the A,B progression.
I hope this helps the person who originally asked me, as well as those who may be wondering the same thing.